# Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Sonar

> Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-vs-sonar
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 45.7 to 31.3.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0765 / $0.26 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $1 for Sonar.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Perplexity |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 37.8 |
| Rank | 88 | 184 |
| Context | 262K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.0765 | $1 |
| Output $/M | $0.26 | $1 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156)
- Sonar: 35.1 (#217)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 35.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1446 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205)
- Sonar: 20.3 (#221)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1438 | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 37.9% |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 46.9% |

## Math

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61)
- Sonar: 31.3 (#197)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 41.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1469 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79)
- Sonar: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43)
- Sonar: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68)
- Sonar: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | — |
| LMArena French | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78)
- Sonar: 71.5 (#146)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 76.2% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87)
- Sonar: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110)
- Sonar: 52.6 (#166)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Sonar?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Sonar?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0765 per million input tokens and $0.26 per million output tokens; Sonar lists at $1 and $1.

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Sonar better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.8 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.