# Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Coder Next in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 40% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 32.3% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0675 / $0.23 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 34.3 |
| Rank | 92 | 232 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.0675 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $0.23 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 40% | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | 34.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1470 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | — |
| LMArena French | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0675 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next lists at $0.12 and $0.80.

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.