# Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 4 26B A4B IT's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Flash in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 38.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 6% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 23% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.0675 / $0.23 for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 92 | 156 |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.0675 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $0.23 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | 23% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | 144.64 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1470 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | 82.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | — |
| LMArena French | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 4 26B A4B IT's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Gemma 4 26B A4B IT lists at $0.0675 and $0.23.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.