# Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Phi-4 Mini

> Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-vs-phi-4-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 2 categories and Phi-4 Mini in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 45.6 to 24.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 40% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 10.8% for Phi-4 Mini.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0765 / $0.26 per million input/output tokens, against $0.075 / $0.30 for Phi-4 Mini.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 30.4 |
| Rank | 88 | 280 |
| Context | 262K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.0765 | $0.075 |
| Output $/M | $0.26 | $0.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156)
- Phi-4 Mini: 27.6 (#312)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 40% | 10.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1446 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205)
- Phi-4 Mini: 21.7 (#190)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1438 | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1469 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79)
- Phi-4 Mini: 24.8 (#261)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | 23.5% |
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | — |
| LMArena French | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Phi-4 Mini?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Phi-4 Mini?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0765 per million input tokens and $0.26 per million output tokens; Phi-4 Mini lists at $0.075 and $0.30.

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.8 versus 27.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Phi-4 Mini share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.