# Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs o3-mini

> Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-vs-o3-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 23

## Summary

- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 6 categories and o3-mini in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 45.7 to 27.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 6% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 17% for o3-mini.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0765 / $0.26 per million input/output tokens, against $1.10 / $4.40 for o3-mini.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 88 | 205 |
| Context | 262K | 200K |
| Input $/M | $0.0765 | $1.10 |
| Output $/M | $0.26 | $4.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156)
- o3-mini: 41.4 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 40% | 39.8% |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | 43.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1446 | 1378 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 60.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| GSO | — | 1.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 82.7% |
| CadEval | — | 54% |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: —
- o3-mini: 29.3 (#79)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 22.5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205)
- o3-mini: 16.3 (#295)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | 17% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1438 | 1366 |
| DTBench | 74.9% | 68.8% |
| LMCA | 29.7% | 19% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | 140.35 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 22.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 34.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 89.6% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 70.6% |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.6 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.9% |

## Math

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61)
- o3-mini: 27.6 (#236)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | 76.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1469 | 1396 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 96.5% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 12.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79)
- o3-mini: 38.3 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | 77% |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1364 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 17.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43)
- o3-mini: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68)
- o3-mini: 45.9 (#159)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1422 | 1319 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1379 |
| LMArena French | 1459 | 1333 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1304 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | 1321 |
| LMArena German | — | 1303 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1286 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1314 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78)
- o3-mini: 75.3 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1338 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 84.4% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87)
- o3-mini: 33.8 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | 1343 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 50% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110)
- o3-mini: 50.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1337 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1286 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1320 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 61.7% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 50.7% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than o3-mini?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or o3-mini?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0765 per million input tokens and $0.26 per million output tokens; o3-mini lists at $1.10 and $4.40.

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or o3-mini better for coding?

o3-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 38.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and o3-mini share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.