# Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Muse Spark 1.3

> Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 43.5 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT costs 19× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-vs-muse-spark-1-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 24

## Summary

- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 1 category and Muse Spark 1.3 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 54.0 to 21.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 6% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 38% for Muse Spark 1.3.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0675 / $0.23 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.3.
- Muse Spark 1.3 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 54.8 |
| Rank | 92 | 27 |
| Context | 262K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.0675 | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | $0.23 | $4.25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164)
- Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | 1657 |
| SciCode | 40% | 59.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1514 |
| CursorBench | — | 41.6% |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: —
- Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 57.8% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 27.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213)
- Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 26% |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | 38% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | 1503 |
| DTBench | 74.9% | 96.5% |
| LMCA | 29.7% | 53.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | 156.75 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 25% |
| Bench to the Future 3 | — | 0.14 |

## Math

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67)
- Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | 99.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1494 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 58% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85)
- Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1516 |
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46)
- Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | 1309 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1471 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71)
- Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | 1481 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1529 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1524 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1490 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1490 |
| LMArena German | — | 1515 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1501 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82)
- Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1477 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91)
- Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1488 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115)
- Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1490 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1455 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | 1906 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1482 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 43.5 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT costs 19× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Muse Spark 1.3?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0675 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Muse Spark 1.3 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.3 does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Muse Spark 1.3 share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 37.