# Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Mixtral 8x7B

> Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-vs-mixtral-8x7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 45.6 to 11.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 73.2% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 30.6% for Mixtral 8x7B.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0765 / $0.26 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $0.70 for Mixtral 8x7B.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 32K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 26.8 |
| Rank | 88 | 328 |
| Context | 262K | 32K |
| Input $/M | $0.0765 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $0.26 | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156)
- Mixtral 8x7B: 32.2 (#265)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1446 | 1127 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 39.6% |
| MBPP+ | — | 49.7% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205)
- Mixtral 8x7B: 17.4 (#283)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1438 | 1115 |
| DTBench | 74.9% | 49.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | 118.38 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.2% |
| ForecastBench | — | 56.3 |
| HellaSwag | — | 86.7% |
| PIQA | — | 83.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 77.2% |

## Math

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61)
- Mixtral 8x7B: 17.2 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1469 | 1147 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 10.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10% |
| GSM8K | — | 74.4% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79)
- Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#296)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | 30.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1088 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 33.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 29.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 87.3% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 85.8% |
| TriviaQA | — | 82.2% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43)
- Mixtral 8x7B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68)
- Mixtral 8x7B: 29.8 (#261)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1422 | 1077 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1055 |
| LMArena French | 1459 | 1165 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1090 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | 1110 |
| LMArena German | — | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 931 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 968 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78)
- Mixtral 8x7B: 51.2 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1110 |
| IFEval | — | 57.5% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87)
- Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#255)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | 1103 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110)
- Mixtral 8x7B: 34.4 (#265)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1132 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1109 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1115 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
| WildBench | — | 67.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Mixtral 8x7B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Mixtral 8x7B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0765 per million input tokens and $0.26 per million output tokens; Mixtral 8x7B lists at $0.70 and $0.70.

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.8 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT does, with 262K tokens against 32K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Mixtral 8x7B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.
