# Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Llama 3-8B

> Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-vs-llama-3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-8B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 8.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 82.2% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 1.9% for Llama 3-8B.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 25.5 |
| Rank | 92 | 344 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.09 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164)
- Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1152 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 31.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 36.9% |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 56.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 54.8% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213)
- Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | 1133 |
| DTBench | 74.9% | 43.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | 116.45 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 57.3% |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.6 |
| WinoGrande | — | 75.7% |

## Math

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67)
- Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | 1.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1151 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 6.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85)
- Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | 26.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1113 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 82.8% |
| MMLU | — | 68.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 82.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 67.7% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46)
- Llama 3-8B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71)
- Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | 1098 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1076 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1159 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1109 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1173 |
| LMArena German | — | 1104 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 967 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1004 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82)
- Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1127 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91)
- Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1128 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115)
- Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1150 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1152 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Llama 3-8B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Llama 3-8B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.