# Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Llama 2-7B

> Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-vs-llama-2-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 58.8 to 28.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 6% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 0% for Llama 2-7B.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 88 | 315 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.0765 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.26 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1446 | 1002 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205)
- Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1438 | 1009 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | 98.54 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |

## Math

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1469 | 1042 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79)
- Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1036 |
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43)
- Llama 2-7B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68)
- Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1422 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 973 |
| LMArena French | 1459 | 969 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | 1007 |
| LMArena German | — | 978 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78)
- Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1006 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87)
- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | 999 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1029 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Llama 2-7B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.8 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Llama 2-7B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.