# Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10

> Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-vs-hunyuan-standard
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 35.6.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 92 | 193 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.0675 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.23 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1270 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | 1264 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1274 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1245 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1301 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1275 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.