# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

> Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-step-2-16k-exp-202412
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 8 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 25.9 to 19.9.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 39.2 |
| Rank | 206 | 171 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1316 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1299 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1304 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1279 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1290 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1324 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1287 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1307 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1321 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1328 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1292 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.