# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 7.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Solar Pro4 leads 27.3 to 19.2.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for Solar Pro4.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 33K.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 41.5 |
| Rank | 203 | 123 |
| Context | 33K | 524K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Solar Pro4: 39.9 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1439 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Solar Pro4: 27.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1398 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Solar Pro4: 36.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1418 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Solar Pro4: 39.0 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1421 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Solar Pro4: 49.0 (#134)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1417 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1403 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1383 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1408 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Solar Pro4: 72.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1376 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Solar Pro4: 42.0 (#125)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1379 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Solar Pro4: 56.7 (#133)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1313 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1391 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 7.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or Solar Pro4?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; Solar Pro4 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Solar Pro4 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.