# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs QwQ-32B

> QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 1 category and QwQ-32B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 38.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 203 | 153 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1326 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1323 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1337 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | 1263 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1278 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than QwQ-32B?

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or QwQ-32B better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and QwQ-32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.