# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

> Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 12× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 30.1 to 19.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 66.7% for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $2 for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct.
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 33K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 203 | 100 |
| Context | 33K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | $2 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.9 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1441 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 30.1 (#79)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | 66.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1428 |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 36.3 (#118)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1440 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.3 (#102)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1416 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 63% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.3 (#88)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1407 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1461 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1415 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1416 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | 1398 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1366 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1403 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1436 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 71.0 (#154)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1388 |
| IFEval | — | 81% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#218)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1403 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 55.6% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.2 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1415 |
| WildBench | — | 80.7% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 12× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct lists at $0.50 and $2.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct does, with 131K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.