# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen3.8 Max

> Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-qwen3-8-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 35.1.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 56.8 |
| Rank | 206 | 22 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1502 |
| DeepSWE | — | 57.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1674 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 17.8% |
| SciCode | — | 53.2% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 63.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 55.1% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23.2% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1496 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 88.3% |
| CritPt | — | 20% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 38% |
| DTBench | — | 92% |
| LMCA | — | 46.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.41 |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1499 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 100% |
| ProofBench | — | 58% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1507 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 47.3% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1314 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1538 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1503 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1483 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1467 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1461 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1481 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1492 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1479 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1489 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1483 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1479 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1489 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3.8 Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.