# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen3.8 27B

> Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 15× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.8 27B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-qwen3-8-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 27B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.8 27B leads 65.9 to 50.3.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $0.99 / $1.49 for Qwen3.8 27B.
- Qwen3.8 27B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 33K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 203 | 64 |
| Context | 33K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.99 |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | $1.49 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 50.3 (#42)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1487 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1592 |
| SciCode | — | 46.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 31.5 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1459 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 54.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| DTBench | — | 88% |
| LMCA | — | 41.4% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 45% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.38 |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 35.7 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1453 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 40.9 (#105)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1482 |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 40.5 (#36)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1270 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 54.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1431 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1504 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1468 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1435 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1389 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1421 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1444 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1436 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#66)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1448 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 65.9 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1382 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1443 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1671 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 15× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.8 27B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen3.8 27B?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 27B lists at $0.99 and $1.49.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen3.8 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.8 27B does, with 262K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3.8 27B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 28.