# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 33.6.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.06 / $0.12 for Gemma 3n E4b IT.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 33K.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 203 | 152 |
| Context | 33K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.62 |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Gemma 3n E4b IT lists at $0.06 and $0.12.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.