# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen3.6 27B

> Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-qwen3-6-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 52.4 to 34.2.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 42.2 |
| Rank | 206 | 117 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $3.60 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 78.1% |
| LMCA | — | 34.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.5 |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3.6 27B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.