# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 35.1.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 206 | 106 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.78 |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.