# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.1 to 50.3.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 44.7 |
| Rank | 203 | 72 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1488 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1483 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1473 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1489 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1483 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1467 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1477 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1478 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.