# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 24.8 to 19.2.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 203 | 179 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1314 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1299 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1298 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1289 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.