# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen1.5-72B

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-qwen1-5-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 33.6 to 11.5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 30.3 |
| Rank | 203 | 282 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.4 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1166 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 21.2 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1148 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 30.7 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1164 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#295)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1136 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.4 (#248)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1158 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1049 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1110 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.6 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1142 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.0 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.4 (#253)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen1.5-72B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.