# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen1.5-32B

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-qwen1-5-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 33.6 to 13.5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 203 | 288 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.1 (#278)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 20.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1131 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 30.5 (#207)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1155 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#291)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1126 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.6 (#254)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1100 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1007 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1089 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 58.0 (#260)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#241)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1146 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.4 (#266)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1140 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 31.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen1.5-32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.