# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen1.5-14B

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-qwen1-5-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 50.3 to 33.7.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 32.1 |
| Rank | 203 | 250 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 32.5 (#259)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1138 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 20.5 (#217)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1113 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 29.9 (#214)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1125 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 29.3 (#230)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1094 |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 30.8 (#257)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1147 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1115 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1085 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 57.1 (#266)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1102 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#252)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1113 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1110 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen1.5-14B?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen1.5-14B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.