# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen Max

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen Max in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 35.1 to 22.3.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 34.7 |
| Rank | 206 | 230 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1269 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen Max?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen Max better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.