# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 1 category and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 25.4 to 19.2.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 203 | 168 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1346 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1322 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1307 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1298 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.