# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-nova-2-0-pro-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.8 to 37.0.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 33.4 |
| Rank | 206 | 244 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.