# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Mixtral 8x22B

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-mixtral-8x22b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 8 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 34.2 to 15.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 27.1 |
| Rank | 206 | 333 |
| Context | — | 64K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1166 |
| WeirdML | — | 3.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 40.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 50.2% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 64.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 7.5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1150 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| DTBench | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.03 |
| ForecastBench | — | 56.3 |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1184 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 24.2% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1113 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 46% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 33.4% |
| MMLU | — | 77.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1128 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1116 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1166 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1141 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1037 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1057 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1158 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1151 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1147 |
| IFEval | — | 72.4% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1144 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1162 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1141 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1130 |
| WildBench | — | 71.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Mixtral 8x22B?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Mixtral 8x22B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.