# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Ministral 8B

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-ministral-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 8 categories and Ministral 8B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 33.6 to 12.5.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.10 for Ministral 8B.
- Ministral 8B accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 33K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 27.8 |
| Rank | 203 | 321 |
| Context | 33K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | $0.10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Ministral 8B: 34.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1202 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- Ministral 8B: 16.2 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 11.1% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Ministral 8B: 17.7 (#279)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1191 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| DTBench | — | 45.7% |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Ministral 8B: 23.7 (#262)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1188 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.9% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Ministral 8B: 12.5 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1170 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Ministral 8B: 35.3 (#242)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1165 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1193 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1195 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Ministral 8B: 60.7 (#245)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1161 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#222)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1212 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Ministral 8B: 39.8 (#241)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1191 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1175 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1166 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Ministral 8B?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or Ministral 8B?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; Ministral 8B lists at $0.10 and $0.10.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Ministral 8B better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 8B does, with 128K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Ministral 8B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 8B has 17.