# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Ministral 3B

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 25.6 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 3n E4b IT's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-ministral-3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 33.6 to 10.4.
- Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.04 per million input/output tokens, against $0.06 / $0.12 for Gemma 3n E4b IT.
- Ministral 3B accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 33K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 25.6 |
| Rank | 203 | 336 |
| Context | 33K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.04 |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | $0.04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Ministral 3B: 17.7 (#278)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
| DTBench | — | 51.7% |
| LMCA | — | 5.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.08 |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Ministral 3B: 24.5 (#257)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.4% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#297)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 25.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Ministral 3B?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 25.6 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 3n E4b IT's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or Ministral 3B?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.04 per million output tokens; Gemma 3n E4b IT lists at $0.06 and $0.12.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 3B does, with 128K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Ministral 3B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.