# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs MiniMax-M2

> Gemma 3n E4b IT and MiniMax-M2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-minimax-m2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where MiniMax-M2 leads 70.2 to 66.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 57.8% for MiniMax-M2.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 37.4 |
| Rank | 206 | 204 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1370 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1297 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | 57.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1357 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 14.8% |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1352 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1337 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1366 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1335 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1326 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1328 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1331 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1286 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1361 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than MiniMax-M2?

Gemma 3n E4b IT and MiniMax-M2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and MiniMax-M2 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.