# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs MiniMax-M2.1

> MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-minimax-m2-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.1 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 58.3 to 50.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 38.9 |
| Rank | 206 | 178 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1421 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1384 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 623.83 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 36.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1411 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 11.2% |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1397 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1431 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1430 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1404 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1381 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1397 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1400 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1361 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1396 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than MiniMax-M2.1?

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.