# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 19.9.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 206 | 49 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1534 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1512 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1494 |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1543 |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1493 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1501 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1464 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.