# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 35.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 48.5 |
| Rank | 206 | 55 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1504 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1482 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 12% |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1468 |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1501 |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1463 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1463 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1451 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.