# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Mercury 2

> Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-mercury-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 1 category and Mercury 2 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Mercury 2 leads 70.2 to 66.1.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 39.1 |
| Rank | 206 | 175 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.75 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1391 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1171 |
| SciCode | — | 38.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.58 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1362 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.8% |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- Mercury 2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1358 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1417 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1329 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1330 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1355 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1289 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1358 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Mercury 2?

Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Mercury 2 better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Mercury 2 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.