# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Mercury 2.5

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-mercury-2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 35.1 to 23.3.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 33.5 |
| Rank | 206 | 242 |
| Context | — | 260K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.04 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- Mercury 2.5: 39.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 301.65 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- Mercury 2.5: 22.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- Mercury 2.5: 23.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- Mercury 2.5: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- Mercury 2.5: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- Mercury 2.5: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- Mercury 2.5: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- Mercury 2.5: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Mercury 2.5?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Mercury 2.5 better for coding?

Mercury 2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Mercury 2.5 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2.5 has 4.