# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Magistral Small

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-magistral-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 3 categories and Magistral Small in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 19.9 to 6.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 6.3% for Magistral Small.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 30.2 |
| Rank | 206 | 296 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.19 |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Magistral Small?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Magistral Small better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Magistral Small share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.