# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Llama 3.2 90B

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-llama-3-2-90b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 32.5 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 27.1 |
| Rank | 203 | 326 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Llama 3.2 90B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.