# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Llama 2-13B

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-llama-2-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 50.1 to 29.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 29.6 |
| Rank | 206 | 309 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1062 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1051 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 106.17 |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1065 |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1044 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1087 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1045 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1064 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1050 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Llama 2-13B?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Llama 2-13B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.