# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-kimi-k2-thinking-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 33.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 45.4 |
| Rank | 203 | 63 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1428 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1439 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | 1356 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1329 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1407 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1403 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1373 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1414 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.