# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

> Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-kimi-k2-5-instant
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.8 to 50.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 203 | 92 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1483 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1404 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1443 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1443 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1438 |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1254 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1406 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1450 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1403 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1448 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1430 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1435 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1379 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1427 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.