# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

> Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-hunyuan-large
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 25.5 to 19.9.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 206 | 184 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1307 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1286 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1281 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1276 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1266 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1277 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1341 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1284 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.