# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Grok Build 0.1

> Gemma 3n E4b IT and Grok Build 0.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.7 vs 35.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-grok-build-0-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 31.3 to 19.2.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
- Grok Build 0.1 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 33K.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 35.8 |
| Rank | 203 | 214 |
| Context | 33K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $1 |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | $2 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Grok Build 0.1?

Gemma 3n E4b IT and Grok Build 0.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.7 vs 35.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or Grok Build 0.1?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok Build 0.1 does, with 256K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Grok Build 0.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.