# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Grok 3

> Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-grok-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Grok 3 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 3 leads 46.0 to 33.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 61.3% for Grok 3.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 39.6 |
| Rank | 203 | 150 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Grok 3: 41.5 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1432 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 53.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 37.2% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- Grok 3: 30.2 (#69)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 29.5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Grok 3: 13.8 (#322)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | 61.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1433 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 36.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.34 |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Grok 3: 36.2 (#122)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1390 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 55.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 88.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Grok 3: 46.0 (#76)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1420 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 75.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.8% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Grok 3: 52.5 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1411 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1448 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1460 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1374 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1417 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Grok 3: 75.2 (#69)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1409 |
| IFEval | — | 88.4% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Grok 3: 38.7 (#187)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 58.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Grok 3: 56.0 (#136)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1426 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1414 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1424 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.4% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1186 |
| WildBench | — | 84.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Grok 3?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Grok 3 better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Grok 3 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.