# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Granite 4.0 Micro

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 3n E4b IT's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-granite-4-0-micro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 33.6 to 9.9.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.06 / $0.12 for Gemma 3n E4b IT.
- Granite 4.0 Micro accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 33K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 28.8 |
| Rank | 203 | 312 |
| Context | 33K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.017 |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | $0.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 39.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 84.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| WildBench | — | 67% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Granite 4.0 Micro?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 3n E4b IT's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or Granite 4.0 Micro?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Gemma 3n E4b IT lists at $0.06 and $0.12.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Granite 4.0 Micro does, with 131K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Granite 4.0 Micro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 Micro has 8.