# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-granite-3-0-2b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 50.1 to 29.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 206 | 286 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1090 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 20.5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1073 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1117 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1064 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1033 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1070 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1045 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1056 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1070 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1080 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1046 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1053 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.