# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs GPT-5 Pro

> GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-gpt-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5 Pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Pro leads 56.7 to 34.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 76.8% for GPT-5 Pro.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 46.4 |
| Rank | 206 | 64 |
| Context | — | 400K |
| Input $/M | — | $15 |
| Output $/M | — | $120 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 60.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.31 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | 76.8% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 18.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 61.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 70.2% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 18.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 150.28 |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 55.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 19.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- GPT-5 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than GPT-5 Pro?

GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or GPT-5 Pro better for coding?

GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and GPT-5 Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Pro has 12.