# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs GLM-5V-Turbo

> GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 25× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-glm-5v-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.6 to 50.3.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
- GLM-5V-Turbo accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 33K.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 43.1 |
| Rank | 203 | 86 |
| Context | 33K | 200K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1467 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1400 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1443 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1440 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1451 |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1488 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1443 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1432 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1422 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1439 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1414 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1432 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than GLM-5V-Turbo?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 25× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or GLM-5V-Turbo?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-5V-Turbo does, with 200K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and GLM-5V-Turbo share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.