# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs GLM-5.1

> GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-glm-5-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.1 leads 54.9 to 34.2.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 47.8 |
| Rank | 206 | 59 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1485 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 74.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1508 |
| SciCode | — | 43.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 57.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 887.1 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 40.9% |
| ExploitBench | — | 18.1% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,634 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1472 |
| SimpleBench | — | 55.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 77.7% |
| CritPt | — | 4.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 69.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.84 |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1473 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 36.8% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 67.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 22.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 33.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 12.5% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1476 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 89.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1447 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1515 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1474 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1465 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1434 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1418 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1454 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1469 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1451 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1466 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1461 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1453 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1472 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1592 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or GLM-5.1 better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and GLM-5.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.1 has 41.