# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs GLM-4.6

> GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-glm-4-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.6 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6 leads 61.1 to 50.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 47.4% for GLM-4.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 41.4 |
| Rank | 206 | 135 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- GLM-4.6: 40.1 (#148)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1449 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1340 |
| SciCode | — | 38.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 340.82 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- GLM-4.6: 32.3 (#66)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 24.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 72.4% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- GLM-4.6: 23.7 (#172)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | 47.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1440 |
| CritPt | — | 1.1% |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- GLM-4.6: 39.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1432 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- GLM-4.6: 40.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1431 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.5% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- GLM-4.6: 53.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1499 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1459 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1393 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1419 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1436 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- GLM-4.6: 74.3 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1410 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1422 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- GLM-4.6: 61.1 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1440 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1427 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1411 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than GLM-4.6?

GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or GLM-4.6 better for coding?

GLM-4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and GLM-4.6 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6 has 29.